Simmons

Simmons v. Marriot Court Yard

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20214:19-cv-04431California3,677 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAWNIA SIMMONS, Case No. 19-cv-04431-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARRIOT COURT YARD, Re: Dkt. No. 55 Defendant.

13 Defendant Courtyard Management Corporation’s (“Marriott” or “defendant”)1 motion for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on December 2, 2021. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, appeared on her own behalf. Defendant appeared through its counsel, Monte K. Grix and Alia L. Chaib. Having read the papers filed by the parties2 and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion, for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND Courtyard Management Corporation is a subsidiary of Marriott International, Inc. (“Marriott”) and operates the Courtyard by Marriott brand of hotels, which includes the Courtyard hotel in San Ramon, California (the “Courtyard San Ramon”). Webb…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.