Pirani

Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20213:19-cv-05857California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FIYYAZ PIRANI, Case No. 19-cv-05857-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO LIFT STAY

SLACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 98 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff’s motion to lift the stay is scheduled for a hearing on January 7, 2022. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion. Pirani seeks to lift the stay to allow him to conduct discovery and move for class certification. However, as Pirani acknowledges, this case remains on appeal. Slack has petitioned for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and on November 29, the Ninth Circuit ordered Pirani to respond to Slack’s petition. The pending Ninth Circuit appeal “divests the district court of jurisdiction over the particular issues involved in that appeal.” City of Los Angeles, Harbor Div.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.