Mandich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IVAN V. CLEVELAND, Case No. 21-CV-03993-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

L. MANDICH, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Complaint”), and an in forma pauperis motion (“IFP”). Dkt. Nos. 1, 2. The Court informed plaintiff that he had failed to file a complete IFP motion and that he needed to complete an IFP motion within twenty-eight days or face dismissal. Dkt. No. 3. After plaintiff failed to respond, the Court dismissed this action. Dkt. No. 4. Following a request from plaintiff, Dkt. No. 6, the Court reopened this action, Dkt. No. 7. The Court gave plaintiff two extensions of time to complete his IFP motion. See Dkt. Nos. 7, 9. Plaintiff now has completed his IFP motion. Dkt. No. 10. Because plaintiff has three strikes under 28 U.S.C § 1915(g), the Court orders plaintiff to show cause why his motion for leave to…