Kinzer

Kinzer v. LifeAID Beverage Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20215:21-cv-05589California3,243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MICHAEL KINZER, Case No. 21-cv-05589-EJD (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE NOVEMBER 19, 2021

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE

LIFEAID BEVERAGE CO., Re: Dkt. No. 33 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Michael Kinzer and defendant LifeAid Beverage Co. (“LifeAid”) ask the Court to resolve their dispute concerning the proper scope of Mr. Kinzer’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of LifeAid. Dkt. No. 33. The Court held a hearing on the matter on November 30, 2021. Dkt. No. 36. Having considered the parties’ submission and arguments, the Court resolves the dispute as set forth below. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Kinzer asserts claims on behalf of himself and a putative class for negligent and willful violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. Dkt. No. 14. Mr. Kinzer alleges that after he added his cellular telephone number to the national Do-Not-Call (“DNC”) registry,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.