Shinbachew

Shinbachew v. Global Parking Systems, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20213:21-cv-08440California374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL SHINBACHEW, Case No. 21-cv-08440-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED

TO STATE COURT

GLOBAL PARKING SYSTEMS, LLC, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Defendants Global Parking Systems, LLC and SP Plus Corporation removed this case from the Superior Court for the County of San Mateo, asserting diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). According to Defendants, Plaintiff Daniel Shinbachew is a citizen of California, while Global Parking Systems is a citizen of Louisiana (where it is incorporated and headquartered) and SP Plus is a citizen of Delaware (where it is incorporated) and Illinois (where it is headquartered). Defendants therefore assert that there is complete diversity of citizenship—i.e., no defendant is a citizen of the same state as the plaintiff—as required for jurisdiction under § 1332. Although Defendants assert that Global Parking Systems is “a corporation formed under the laws of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.