Razavi

Razavi v. Coti

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20215:17-cv-04341California376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MELINA RAZAVI, Case No. 17-cv-04341-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOLLOWING

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO RESPOND

CARLOS COTI and GEICO INSURANCE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

COMPANY,

[Re: ECF 28] Defendants.

14 15 On November 9, 2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice due Plaintiff’s failure to provide the U.S. Marshal with sufficient information to complete service of process on defendants. See OSC, ECF 28. The Court had ordered service by the U.S. Marshal because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis. See Order Directing Service, ECF 24. On November 2, 2021, the U.S. Marshal returned unexecuted summons with respect to both Defendants, indicating that Defendants could not be located at the addresses provided by Plaintiff. See Summons Ret. Unexecuted, ECF 27. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.