Razavi
Razavi v. Coti
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MELINA RAZAVI, Case No. 17-cv-04341-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOLLOWING
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO RESPOND
CARLOS COTI and GEICO INSURANCE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
COMPANY,
[Re: ECF 28] Defendants.
14 15 On November 9, 2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice due Plaintiff’s failure to provide the U.S. Marshal with sufficient information to complete service of process on defendants. See OSC, ECF 28. The Court had ordered service by the U.S. Marshal because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis. See Order Directing Service, ECF 24. On November 2, 2021, the U.S. Marshal returned unexecuted summons with respect to both Defendants, indicating that Defendants could not be located at the addresses provided by Plaintiff. See Summons Ret. Unexecuted, ECF 27. …