Watkins

Watkins v. MGA Entertainment, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20213:21-cv-00617California5,436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBIN WATKINS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00617-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., COMPLAINT

10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 35

12 I. INTRODUCTION This product defect case was originally brought as a putative class action by Plaintiffs Robin Watkins and Adam Sensney under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(1). They asserted claims for negligence, breach of express and implied warranties, and violation of California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA) and Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) against MGA Entertainment, Inc. (“MGA”), which manufactures, sells and distributes a toy line called L.O.L. Surprise!, based on allegations that a product in the line, the 2-in-1 Glamper Fashion Camper (“Glamper”), had a defective button in which a child’s finger could become trapped. MGA brought a motion to dismiss, which the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.