Hadsell

Hadsell v. United States of America, the Department of Treasury

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20215:20-cv-03512California1,139 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CHRISTOPHER HADSELL, Case No. 20-cv-03512-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. RULE 60 MOTION FOR RELIEF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE Re: Dkt. No.

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY BY ITS

AGENCY, THE INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE,

13 Defendant. 14 On November 19, 2021, the Court issued an order denying Mr. Hadsell’s motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 56. On November 30, 2021, Mr. Hadsell filed a motion pursuant to Rule 59(e) to alter, amend, or vacate the November 19, 2021 order. Dkt. No. 60. On December 2, 2021, the Court denied that motion, stating that Rule 59(e) is not the proper vehicle for seeking reconsideration of a pre-judgment order. Dkt. No. 61. To the extent he believes he has grounds to do so, Mr. Hadsell was directed to file a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration that complies with Civil Local Rule 7-9. Dkt. No. 61. Instead of complying with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.