Williams v. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20213:20-cv-03510California4,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PETER TODD WILLIAMS, Case No. 20-cv-03510-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

v. STRIKE, MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE

ORDER, AND ADMINISTRATIVE

LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL

SECURITY, LLC,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 39, 49, 50, 73 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Peter Todd Williams, pro se, asserts a claim against his former employer Defendant Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (“LLNS”) for retaliation in violation of the False Claims Act (“FCA”). Based on concerns regarding confidentiality and the logistical challenges of litigating claims involving sensitive information, LLNS moves to strike certain allegations of Williams’s complaint under Rule 12(f) and for a protective order governing discovery. Williams opposes aspects of both motions. The Court held a hearing on December 10, 2021. For the reasons discussed below, the motion for a protective order is GRANTED with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.