Fodera, Jr. v. Equinox Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20213:19-cv-05072California4,390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RONALD DAVID RIVERS, Case No. 20-cv-09485-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 15, 18 Defendant.

Plaintiff Ronald David Rivers, proceeding pro se, seeks review of the March 2019 determination by Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Cheryl Tompkin that he is not disabled and not entitled to benefits. Tompkin’s 2019 decision followed a 2017 decision by Magistrate Judge Maria Elena James, Case No. 16-cv-2399-MEJ, remanding Rivers’s case for further administrative proceedings in light of significant, multiple errors in the first ALJ decision (from August 2012) denying plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Administrative Record (“AR”) 91. On this appeal, Rivers argues that ALJ Tompkin gave too much weight to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.