Flesch

Flesch v. County of Lake

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20213:21-cv-02018California762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL G. FLESCH, Case No. 21-cv-02018-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS

COUNTY OF LAKE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 54 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is defendant County of Lake’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint, specifically, the following claims: Religious Discrimination under Title VII (First Claim), Whistleblower Retaliation under California Labor Code § 1102.5 (Third Claim), Retaliation for First Amendment Speech Exercise – 18 U.S.C. § 1983 (Fourth and Fifth Claims), Religious Discrimination under FEHA (Sixth Claim), and Religious Harassment under FEHA (Eighth Claim). Dkt. No. 54. Based on the pleadings and the arguments raised in the parties’ respective briefing papers, the Court finds the motion appropriate for resolution without oral argument and hereby VACATES the hearing set for December 17, 2021 per Local Rule 7-1(b). For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.