Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Robert E. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20215:21-cv-03216California5,218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD Case No. 21-cv-03216-BLF

COMPANY,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING HILL MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART MOBILE MINI MOTION TO STRIKE ROBERT E. HILL, et al., [Re: ECF Nos. 20, 21] Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company has filed this lawsuit seeking recovery of costs, declaratory and injunctive relief, and damages related to environmental remediation required due to the improper use of chemical agents on a property previously leased to entities affiliated with Defendants Robert E. Hill, Robert W. “Rocky” Hill, Privette Inc., and Mobile Mini Inc. Two groups of defendants have filed motions in response to the Complaint. First, both Hills and Privette Inc. have moved to dismiss the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act claim and all requests for punitive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.