Harris
Harris v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN JEROME HARRIS JR., Case No. 21-cv-09570-JCS
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., et al., COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED
Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1,
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Kevin Jerome Harris Jr., pro se, applies to proceed in forma pauperis. See dkt. 2. Sufficient cause having been shown, that application is GRANTED. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Harris’s complaint against Defendants Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. and Vancouver Toyota1 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Harris is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his complaint should not be dismissed for the reasons discussed below. No later than January 10, 2022, Harris must file either an amended complaint curing the deficiencies addressed in this order or a response arguing why his current complaint is sufficient. If Harris does not file such a response or his response fails…