McCurty

McCurty v. Madsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20213:21-cv-05435California3,735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL MCCURTY, Case No. 21-cv-05435-YGR

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v.

H. MADSEN, et al., Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a state prisoner incarcerated at Correctional Training Facility (CTF), has filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Dkt. 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted in a separate written Order. Plaintiff has named the following defendants at CTF: Correctional Officer H. Madsen, Correctional Officer Arlene Stephens, Warden Craig Koenig, and Does 1-3. Dkt. 1 at 5-6.1 Plaintiff seeks injunctive and declaratory relief and compensatory and punitive damages. Id. at 15-16. Venue is proper because the events giving rise to the claims are alleged to have occurred at CTF, which is located in this judicial district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). II. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.