Clay

Clay v. Department of Treasury

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20214:21-cv-08132California614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 THOMAS CLAY, Case No. 21-cv-08132-PJH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 11 Defendants.

11 Plaintiff, a Texas state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil action against a governmental entity. The court denied the case at screening and plaintiff has filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). A motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59 must be made no later than twenty-eight days after entry of judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (effective Dec. 1, 2009). A motion for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) “‘should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, unless the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the law.’” McDowell v. Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir. 1999) (citation omitted) (en banc). Evidence is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.