VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC, Case No. 17-cv-05671-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
FILE EXHIBIT 9 TO INTEL’S
INTEL CORPORATION, AMENDED ANSWER UNDER SEAL
AND TO CONSIDER WHETHER
Defendant. ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL
SHOULD BE SEALED
12 [Re: ECF Nos. 331, 332, 335, 336]
14 Before the Court are Defendant Intel Corporation’s (“Intel”) (1) Administrative Motions to 15 File Exhibit 9 to its Amended Answer Under Seal, ECF Nos. 331, 335, and (2) Administrative 16 Motions to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed, ECF Nos. 332, 336. 17 Finjan LLC (“Finjan”) submitted declarations in support of the Administrative Motions at ECF Nos. 18 332 and 336. See ECF Nos. 337, 338. All four motions pertain to a patent licensing agreement (the 19 “Agreement”) between Intel and Finjan that Intel attached as Exhibit 9 to its amended answer. See 20 ECF No. 334. Intel seeks to seal…