VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20215:17-cv-05671California1,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC, Case No. 17-cv-05671-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

FILE EXHIBIT 9 TO INTEL’S

INTEL CORPORATION, AMENDED ANSWER UNDER SEAL

AND TO CONSIDER WHETHER

Defendant. ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL

SHOULD BE SEALED

12 [Re: ECF Nos. 331, 332, 335, 336]

14 Before the Court are Defendant Intel Corporation’s (“Intel”) (1) Administrative Motions to 15 File Exhibit 9 to its Amended Answer Under Seal, ECF Nos. 331, 335, and (2) Administrative 16 Motions to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed, ECF Nos. 332, 336. 17 Finjan LLC (“Finjan”) submitted declarations in support of the Administrative Motions at ECF Nos. 18 332 and 336. See ECF Nos. 337, 338. All four motions pertain to a patent licensing agreement (the 19 “Agreement”) between Intel and Finjan that Intel attached as Exhibit 9 to its amended answer. See 20 ECF No. 334. Intel seeks to seal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.