Moore
Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAMARA MOORE, et al., Case No. 16-cv-07001-MMC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; VACATING HEARING
MARS PETCARE US, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
12 Before the Court is plaintiffs Tamara Moore, Greta L. Ervin, Raff Arando, Nichols Smith, Renee Edgren, and Cynthia Welton’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed October 28, 2021. Defendants Mars Petcare U.S., Inc., Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, “Mars Defendants”), and Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. (“Hill’s Pet Nutrition”) have filed opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision on the parties’ respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for January 7, 2022, and rules as follows. Plaintiffs are six California pet owners who purchased prescription pet food manufactured…