Andersen

Andersen v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20214:21-cv-08244California768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 BARBARA ANDERSEN, Case No. 21-cv-08244-YGR (DMR)

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION v. FOR LEAVE TO ISSUE A SUBPOENA

GREGORY A. THOMPSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendants.

This matter has been referred to the undersigned for resolution of Plaintiff Barbara Andersen’s motion for leave to issue a subpoena and motion for “a shortened motion date.” [Docket Nos. 9, 11, 16.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion for leave to issue a subpoena is denied without prejudice. The motion for a shortened motion date is denied as moot. I. DISCUSSION Plaintiff filed the complaint against Defendants Gregory A. Thompson and Google LLC on October 22, 2021 alleging claims for violation of the Copyright Act, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and defamation. Defendant Thompson has not yet been served and has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.