Fleming
Fleming v. Provest California LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
BRUNO FLEMING, Case No. 21-CV-04462-LHK
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
REMAND
v. Re: Dkt. No. 11 PROVEST CALIFORNIA LLC, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Bruno Fleming (“Plaintiff”) brings the instant lawsuit against Defendants ProVest California LLC and Hector Torres (collectively, “Defendants”). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand. Having considered the parties’ briefs, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff Fleming incurred a consumer credit debt at some unknown time for personal,
1 Plaintiff’s motion to remand contains a notice of motion that is separately paginated from the points and authorities in support of the motion. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) requires that the notice of motion and the points and authorities in support of the motion be contained in one document with the same…