San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. National Union Fire Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20213:20-cv-04468California7,521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID Case No. 20-cv-04468-EMC

TRANSIT DISTRICT,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMPANY, et al., Docket Nos. 76-78, 80 Defendants.

13 14 I. INTRODUCTION This is an insurance coverage action wherein plaintiff San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (“BART”) is seeking coverage for a workers’ compensation claim filed by BART employee Michael Gonsolin. Gonsolin was hired as a BART police officer in 1979, and retired in 2005. In 2006, he was diagnosed with myeloma, which he alleged arose from the course of his employment with BART. Gonsolin filed a claim with the Worker’s Compensation Appeals Board (“WCAB”) which was settled in December 2007. As part of the settlement, BART and Gonsolin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.