Ramachandran

Ramachandran v. City of Los Altos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20215:18-cv-01223California752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 18-cv-01223-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND

RELATED DATES

CITY OF LOS ALTOS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 266 Defendants.

13 Before the Court is plaintiff Satish Ramachandran’s motion to continue the trial date and related dates, which the Court treats as a motion for administrative relief under Civil Local Rule 7- 11. Dkt. No. 266. Defendants oppose this motion. Dkt. No. 268. This case was filed on February 25, 2018 and has been pending now for nearly four years. Dkt. No. 1. After two continuances, the period for fact discovery closed on January 29, 2020. Dkt. Nos. 30, 88, 117. All that remains for trial are Mr. Ramachandran’s claims against defendants Mr. Ballard, Mr. Jordan, and the City of Los Altos for violation of his First Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Dkt. No. 199 at 31. In January 2021, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.