Brownfield

Brownfield v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20215:21-cv-09878California1,026 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DAVID BROWNFIELD, et al., Case No. 5:21-cv-09878-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY

v. RESTRAINING ORDER

ROB BONTA, Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendant.

On December 22, 2021, Plaintiffs Kirk Booth, David Brownfield, and Wynette Sills moved for a temporary restraining order against California Attorney General Rob Bonta (“Defendant”). Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order, Dkt. No. 10-2. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion and ORDERS the Parties to submit simultaneous briefing, not to exceed fifteen pages, regarding whether Plaintiffs have Article III standing to pursue their claims by January 17, 2022. This case arises from the California Legislature’s September 22, 2021 enactment of Assembly Bill 1356, which amended Section 423.5 of the California Penal Code. Under Assembly Bill 1356, it is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.