Sepehry-Fard

Sepehry-Fard v. Lee

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20215:20-cv-03585California3,230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 FAREED SEPEHRY-FARD, Case No. 5:20-cv-03585-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING THE COUNTY

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

v.

H. LEE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 54, 55, 56 Defendants.

Before the Court is Santa Clara County Sherriff Laurie Smith, Deputy H. Lee, Deputy Michael McRoberts, and Deputy Hakeem Lee’s (“the County Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Fareed Sepehry-Fard’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“Mot.”), Dkt. No. 54. Plaintiff filed an opposition,1 and the County Defendants filed a reply. Opposition and Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Opp.”), Dkt. No. 60; Defendants’ Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to

1 Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike parts of the County Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to the Thirteenth Amendment. See Dkt. No. 55. The Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.