Lazor

Lazor v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20213:21-cv-04038California418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FREE LAZOR, Case No. 21-cv-04038-EMC

Petitioner,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

MATTHEW ATCHLEY, et al., Respondent.

12 13 Free Lazor, a pro se prisoner detained at Salinas Valley State Prison, filed the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus (“2021 Petition”). Docket No. 1. The 2021 Petition is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243 and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The 2021 Petition must be dismissed because the relief sought is not available in a habeas action. Petitioner seeks to obtain photocopies of a previous habeas petition filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. See Pet. at 2. Specifically, Petitioner seeks photocopies of documents filed in Lazor v. Warden CDC Systems, Case No. 5:99-cv-20586- RMW (N.D. Cal. filed June 29, 1999) (“1999 Petition”). See id. Photocopies are not available in habeas. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.