Mendoza

Mendoza v. Yu

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20223:21-cv-08632California2,091 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAE-LIN MENDOZA, Case No. 21-cv-08632-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

GREGORY J. YU, Re: Dkt. No. 7 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Mae-Lin Mendoza moves for an order remanding this action to the San Mateo County Superior Court. ECF No. 7. Defendant Gregory J. Yu filed an Opposition (ECF No. 14) and Mendoza filed a Reply (ECF No. 19). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the January 27, 2022 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Mendoza’s motion for the following reasons.1 II. BACKGROUND On October 14, 2019, Mendoza and her mother, Grace Yu, signed the Living Support Plan for Mason Yu, Jr. with Mendoza’s brother, Gregory Yu. Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1-1. Pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.