Sherman

Sherman v. The Regents of University of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20225:20-cv-06441California1,944 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BENJAMIN SHERMAN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06441-VKD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DECEMBER 20, 2021

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTES RE MEDICAL

RECORDS AND INDEPENDENT

THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF MENTAL EXAMINATIONS

CALIFORNIA,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 30, 31 Defendant.

13 Plaintiffs Benjamin Sherman and Zayd Hammoudeh and defendant The Regents of the University of California (“The Regents”) ask the Court to resolve a dispute concerning the production of Mr. Hammoudeh’s medical records and a dispute concerning the scope of The Regents’ independent mental examinations of plaintiffs. Dkt. Nos. 30, 31. The Court finds these disputes suitable for determination without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court will require Mr. Hammoudeh to produce medical records and will require both plaintiffs to submit to mental examinations that are commensurate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.