In Re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20213:19-cv-05822California8,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re No. C 19-05822 WHA GLUMETZA ANTITRUST No. C 19-05831 WHA LITIGATION. No. C 19-06138 WHA No. C 19-06156 WHA No. C 19-06839 WHA This Document Relates to: No. C 19-07843 WHA

ALL ACTIONS. (Consolidated)

OMNIBUS ORDER RE MOTIONS TO

SEAL

14 15 A previous order adopted the parties’ stipulation to file omnibus motions that collected the numerous individual sealing motions the parties filed in conjunction with their summary judgment briefing and the corresponding Daubert motions (Dkt. No. 405). This order resolves those omnibus motions and all other pending motions to seal. 1. THE LEGAL STANDARD. There is a strong public policy in favor of openness in our court system and the public is entitled to know to whom we are providing relief (or not). See Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178–80 (9th Cir. 2006). Consequently, access to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.