City and County of San Francisco v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Case No. 18-cv-07591-CRB (JSC) FRANCISCO, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: WALGREENS' MOTION TO IDENTIFY CERTAIN v. PRESCRIBERS 10 PURDUE PHARMA L.P., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 869 11 Defendants.
12 Now pending before the Court is a discovery dispute joint letter regarding Walgreens’ request that the California Department of Justice identify certain prescribers from the already- produced CURES data. (Dkt. No. 869.) After considering the parties’ submission, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS the motion to compel as to 26 non-objecting prescribers. BACKGROUND The Court previously ordered the California Department of Justice (DOJ) to respond to Walgreens’ subpoena for information in the CURES databased. City & County of San Francisco v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 2021 WL 1111146 (March 23, 2021). In doing so, the…