Armstrong-Harris

Armstrong-Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20224:21-cv-07637California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CEDRIC ARMSTRONG-HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-07637-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND

ORDER VACATING CASE

v. MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.

On July 28, 2021, Plaintiff Cedric Armstrong-Harris filed a complaint against Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and Specialized Loan Servicing in Alameda Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1. On September 29, 2021, Wells Fargo removed the case to federal court. Id. On October 6, 2021, Wells Fargo filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint, Dkt. No. 7, and represents that it served the motion on Plaintiff that same day, Dkt. No. 14. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss was due on or before October 20, 2021. See Civil L.R. 7-3 (“The opposition must be filed and served not more than 14 days after the motion was filed.”). Plaintiff did not file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition by the deadline, as required by Civil 19…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.