Ramsey

Ramsey v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20223:20-cv-05956California1,765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 YVES RAMSEY, Case No. 20-cv-05956-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND DENYING

ANDREW SAUL, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Defendant. Docket Nos. 27, 36 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Yves Ramsey brought this action for judicial review of the Social Security Administration’s termination of her disability benefits. Docket No. 1. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment, arguing that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in (1) rejecting the opinions of Plaintiff’s treating and examining clinicians, (2) rejecting Plaintiff’s subjective symptom complaints; (3) finding that Plaintiff had medically improved; (4) determining Plaintiff’s Residual Functional Capacity; and (5) relying on incomplete vocational expert testimony. Docket No. 27. The government did not oppose Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, concedes each …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.