Garcia
Garcia v. Maciel
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 21-cv-03743-JCS Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
v. COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO
EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JESUS GARCIA MACIEL, et al., JURISDICTION Defendants. On December 31, 2021, Defendants moved to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter |] jurisdiction. That motion primarily addresses standing and does not address supplemental 12 || jurisdiction. In addition to addressing the arguments Defendants have raised, Plaintiff Orlando Garcia is |} ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why, if the Court determines that it has subject matter jurisdiction || over Garcia’s federal claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Court should 16 || not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Garcia’s state-law Unruh Act claim for the 17 || reasons stated in Arroyo v. Rosas, 19 F.4th 1202 (9th Cir. 2021). Although that decision held that 18 || a district…