Harris

Harris v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20223:21-cv-06749California1,135 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VERNON LENARD HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-06749-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISMISSAL

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

(CDCR), et al., Defendants. 12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The original complaint was dismissed with leave to amend and plaintiff has filed an amended complaint. DISCUSSION STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.