Abdo
Abdo v. Fitzsimmons
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN E. ABDO, et al., PRETRIAL ORDER Plaintiffs, Case No. 17-cv-00851-TSH
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 310, 311, 315, 331 MICHAEL FITZSIMMONS, et al., Defendants.
RISING TIDE I, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-01232-TSH
Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. Nos. 303, 306, 309, 328 v.
MICHAEL FITZSIMMONS, et al., Defendants.
18 A. Plaintiffs’ Motions in Limine 1. Opinion Testimony Concerning the Adequacy of Plaintiffs’ Diligence Prior to Investing 21 This motion in limine is moot because Defendants do not plan to offer opinion testimony 22 (lay or expert) concerning the sufficiency of Plaintiffs’ diligence efforts. 23 2. Evidence and Argument Concerning Plaintiffs’ Investment Losses Other than in Connection with Delivery Agent This motion in limine is granted because the minimal probative value of this evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues and wasting…