Malley

Malley v. San Jose Midtown Development LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20225:20-cv-01925California1,363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GREGORY MALLEY, Case No. 5:20-cv-01925-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO ALTER THE

v. JUDGMENT; DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SAN JOSE MIDTOWN DEVELOPMENT ATTORNEYS’ FEES LLC, et al., 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 80, 81 13 Plaintiff Gregory Malley moves to amend the Court’s April 8, 2021 judgment pursuant to 14 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Plaintiff Gregory Malley’s Motion to Amend Court’s 15 Judgment (“Mot. to Amend”), Dkt. No. 80. Defendants oppose this motion. See Defendants’ 16 Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter (“Opp. re Amend”), Dkt. No. 84; see also Plaintiff’s 17 Reply re Motion to Alter Judgment (“Reply re Amend”), Dkt. No. 85. 18 Defendants separately move for attorneys’ fees pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 54(d) and California Civil Code § 1717. See Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (“Mot. for 20 Fees”), Dkt. Nos. 81, 82. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.