Harris

Gregory v. Harris

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20225:21-cv-03311California4,370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JEANE GREGORY, Case No. 21-cv-03311-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. JOEL HARRIS'S MOTION TO

DISMISS

JOEL A. HARRIS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendants.

13 Before the Court is defendant Joel A. Harris’s motion to dismiss plaintiff Jeane Gregory’s complaint. Dkt. No. 25. Although the complaint names several other defendants in addition to Mr. Harris, Ms. Gregory has since dismissed all claims against the other defendants. See Dkt. Nos. 57, 60. The Court finds this matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ submissions and the record as a whole, the Court grants Mr. Harris’s motion to dismiss with limited leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND Ms. Gregory alleges that Mr. Harris, an attorney, prepared her parents’ estate plan, which included a will and trust. Dkt. No. 1 at 2-3, 5. In her will,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.