Scott Crawford v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SCOTT CRAWFORD,
Case No. 17-cv-02664-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 13 Defendants.
15 STEPHAN NAMISNAK, et al., Case No. 17-cv-06124-RS Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 19 Defendants.
21 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs are three people using motorized wheelchairs who asked Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiary Rasier, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” or “Uber”) to provide wheelchair-accessible vehicle (“WAV”) service (“UberWAV”) in their home cities of New Orleans, Louisiana and Jackson, Mississippi. After Uber declined, Plaintiffs brought this suit 27 accusing Uber of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”).1 The Court granted summary judgment to Uber as to Plaintiffs’ claim under ADA subsection 42 U.S.C. § 12184(b)(1), for…