Scott Crawford v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SCOTT CRAWFORD,
Case No. 17-cv-02664-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION IN LIMINE UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 13 Defendants.
15 STEPHAN NAMISNAK, et al., Case No. 17-cv-06124-RS Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 19 Defendants.
21 Defendants filed a motion in limine in advance of the January 5, 2022 pretrial conference, seeking to bar “Plaintiffs from introducing any evidence that relates to or is in support of any request that Defendants take steps to enable or provide WAV trips to persons other than Plaintiffs.” Defendants present two key arguments: (1) Plaintiff’s requested relief to require Uber to provide wheelchair accessible vehicle (“WAV”) service in New Orleans and Jackson requires class certification, which Plaintiffs have not sought or achieved, and (2) Plaintiffs could receive “narrowly tailored to remedy the specific harm shown.” E.…