Woodruff

Woodruff v. De Facto Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20224:21-cv-06862California1,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 7 Case No: 21-cv-06862-SBA KEVIN WOODRUFF, et al.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, STRIKE AND DIRECTING

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE RESPONSE

v. TO MOTION TO DIMISS

DE FACTO BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER Dkt. 26 TREDER & WEISS, LLP, et al., 12 Defendants.

On September 3, 2021, Plaintiffs Kevin Woodruff, Tanya Stutson, and Wanag Tahatan-Bey (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, initiated the instant action by filing a document titled “Trial by Affidavit,” naming as defendants De Facto Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP; Unregister Foreign Bar British Agents; Contra Costa County; Deborah Cooper; Candace Andersen; and David O. Livingston. Dkt. 1. The “Trial by Affidavit” is largely incomprehensible and sets forth no discernable factual background, individual causes of action, or demand for relief. On November 22, 2021, Defendant Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP (“BDFTW”), erroneously sued as De…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.