Gomez

Gomez v. Corro

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20223:21-cv-07085California549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDRES GOMEZ, Case No. 21-cv-07085-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PAULO CORRO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendants.

12 Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint is scheduled for a hearing on January 21, 2022. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED. Plaintiff Andres Gomez alleges that he is blind and uses screen-reader software to access the internet and consume website content on his computer, as well as to access websites and applications on his mobile device. The complaint alleges that defendants Paulo Corro and Arturo Ramirez are real estate agents who operate a real estate website, www.napalisting.com, and that defendants also operate out of a physical office that is open to the public. Compl. ¶¶ 6-7,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.