United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20223:19-cv-01391California687 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND Case No. 19-cv-01391-CRB (JSC)

EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO v. SUPPLEMENT INTERROGATORY ANSWERS

VOLKSWAGEN

AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 77 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is a discovery dispute joint letter regarding Plaintiff’s demand that Defendants supplement answers to interrogatories. (Dkt. No. 77.) After carefully considering the parties’ joint submission, the Court concludes that oral argument is not necessary. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Plaintiff contends certain statements in the Bond Offering Memoranda and responses to the Due Diligence Questionnaires were false and misleading. It served a second set of interrogatories asking Defendants to identify the persons who “drafted, reviewed, approved or furnished” information for the challenged statements.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.