Suski
Suski v. Coinbase Global, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID SUSKI, et al., Case No. 21-cv-04539-SK
Plaintiffs,
ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO
v. COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO
DISMISS
MARDEN-KANE, INC., et al., Defendants. Regarding Docket Nos. 33,
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the motion to compel arbitration or, in the alternative, to dismiss filed by Coinbase Global, Inc. (“Coinbase”). Having carefully considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, the record in the case, and oral argument, the Court hereby DENIES Coinbase’s motion to compel arbitration and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Coinbase’s alternative motion to dismiss for the reasons set forth below. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ request for judicial notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201. (Dkt. No. 41.) BACKGROUND Plaintiffs David Suski, Jaimee Martin, Jonas Calsbeek and Thomas Maher (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this…