B.

B. v. City of Oakland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20224:21-cv-07078California1,801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZELDA B., et al., Case No. 21-cv-07078-DMR

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RELIEF FROM CLAIM NOTICE

REQUIREMENTS

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 4 Defendants.

Plaintiffs Phyllis A. Thomas and Charles A. Thomas, Sr. along with their adult children and two minor grandchildren filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming they suffered constitutional violations while attending a high school basketball game in February 2020. Plaintiffs now move for an order granting them relief from the government tort claims filing requirements of California Government Code section 945.4. [Docket No. 4.] Defendants City of Oakland (“Oakland”), Oakland Unified School District (“OUSD”), and LaRichea Smith oppose the motion. [Docket No. 19.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 19 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is denied.1 I. BACKGROUND On February 15,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.