Dugar

Dugar v. Pak "N" Save Store 3111

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20223:21-cv-08904California1,717 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ERNESTO DUGAR, Case No. 21-cv-08904-JSC

Plaintiff,

SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO

v. 28 U.S.C. § 1915

PAK “N” SAVE STORE #3111, Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendant.

12 The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Dkt. No. 5.) It must now review the complaint’s allegations under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because Plaintiff’s claims do not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, the Court gives Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Defendant operates a store at 555 Floresta Boulevard in San Leandro, California. In May 2021, Plaintiff went to the store to apply for a job and was directed to an upstairs break room for an interview. After waiting while another person was interviewed, Plaintiff interviewed with a manager for a “night stocker” position. (Dkt. No. 1 at 2.) Plaintiff gave the manager his email address and phone number, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.