Poorsina

Poorsina v. Tseng

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20223:20-cv-09122California5,015 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

7 ALI R. POORSINA, Case No: 20-cv-09122 SBA 8 Plaintiff, ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE ENTRY OF vs. DEFAULT; (2) DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; AND TAN TSENG, et al., (3) DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES Defendants. Dkt. 34, 37, 40, 59 Plaintiff Ali R. Poorsina (“Plaintiff” or “Poorsina”), proceeding pro se, brings the instant action against Defendants Tan Tseng (“Tseng”), Terrenz Kukant Cam (“T.K. Cam”), Boi Anh Hong (“Hong”), and Kevin Tu Cam (“K.T. Cam”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Default has been entered against Tseng, T.K. Cam, and Hong but not K.T. Cam. Presently before the Court are: (1) Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against Defendants; (2) Tseng’s motion to set aside the entry of default, in which T.K. Cam and Hong join; and (3) Tseng’s motion to consolidate this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.