Volle
Volle v. Kopelev
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DEBRA VOLLE, Case No.21-cv-00665-NC
Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 30 LEON KOPELEV, et al., 14 Defendants.
16 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that
|| no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the |} Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 || Dated: January 10, 2022 hb-e<——— —_—>