Mogan

Mogan v. Sacks, Ricketts & Case LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20223:21-cv-08431California4,092 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MICHAEL MOGAN, Case No. 21-cv-08431-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR

v. SANCTIONS; MOTION TO DECLARE

PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 32, 34 Defendants.

13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michael Mogan, an attorney licensed in California, brought this case against Airbnb and three of its employees, Jeff Henry, Dave Willner and Sanaz Ebrahini (collectively, “Defendants”) for claims related to a sanction award against him in an underlying state court action brought on behalf of a client. The Court previously dismissed the case, and Defendants now move for sanctions and an order declaring Mogan a vexatious litigant. ECF Nos. 32 (sanctions motion), 34 (vexatious litigant motion). Mogan filed an Opposition to the sanctions motion (ECF No. 37), but not the vexatious litigant motion. Defendants filed a Reply (ECF No. 45). The Court finds these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.