Goodwin
Goodwin v. Marin County Transit District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AUSTIN GOODWIN, Case No. 21-cv-07251-JSC Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE
Vv. MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE
FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS
MARIN COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants. qg
Plaintiffs administrative motion to continue the deadline for service of process on newly-
v || added Defendant Marin Airporter is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 18.) No response to
|| the motion has been filed and the time to respond has run. See Civ. L.R. 7-11(b). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of process on each named defendant
= || within ninety days after the filing of a complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P.4(m). “For defendants who are
|| added by later amendments to the complaint, the time limit for service runs from the date of the amendment.” MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. v. Kelsey, No. CV 18—3802-JEFW (AFMx), 2018 WL || 6445694,…