Monroe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SEAN EVERETT MONROE, Case No. 20-cv-07295-SK Plaintiff, y. ORDER REGARDING STANDING KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant. In his motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff makes a constitutional challenge to the || administrative proceedings. It is not clear whether the parties have squarely addressed whether S 14 || Plaintiff has the standing to raise this challenge. Regardless of whether the parties address || standing, “[flederal courts are required sua sponte to examine jurisdictional issues such as a || standing.” Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles, 279 F.3d 862, 868 (9th Cir.2001) (citations || omitted). Therefore, the Court has “both the power and the duty to raise the adequacy of || [Plaintiffs] standing sua sponte.”. In the interest of fairness, the Court will provide the parties an || Opportunity to brief whether Plaintiff has standing to assert the constitutional concern at issue. By…