Harris

Harris v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20223:21-cv-06577California5,805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL JAY HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-06577-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) OF DISMISSAL; (2)

v. DENYING THIRD REQUEST FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

MATTHEW ATCHLEY, et al., AND PRELIMINARY INJOUNCTION;

AND (3) DENYING MOTION TO

Defendants. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Docket Nos. 9,

13 14 This is a pro se prisoner’s civil rights action. In his initially filed Complaint, Plaintiff Matthew Harris complained that an impending transfer to another prison would disrupt his continuing education. See generally, Docket No. 1 (“Complaint”). Mr. Harris now has filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) which adds the allegation that Mr. Harris, “a convicted child rapist and molester 19 times over,” FAC ¶ 43, is about to be transferred out of sensitive needs custody despite safety concerns, see generally, id. Mr. Harris also has filed a third motion seeking a temporary restraining order (“TRO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.