Johnson v. Serenity Transportation, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20223:15-cv-02004California1,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CURTIS JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 15-cv-02004-JSC

Plaintiffs,

FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS

v. ACTION SETTLEMENT

SERENITY TRANSPORTATION, INC., et Re: Dkt. No. 346 al., 11 Defendants.

12 On July 21, 2021, the Court granted preliminary approval of this class action settlement.1 (Dkt. No. 342.) Class counsel subsequently mailed notice to 99 class members, none of whom has objected to or sought an exclusion from the proposed settlement. (Dkt. No. 346-1 ¶¶ 2–4.) Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for final approval of the settlement. (Dkt. No. 346.) After careful consideration of Plaintiffs’ submissions, and because no class member has objected to the settlement, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the January 13, 2022 hearing, and GRANTS the motion. BACKGROUND The relevant procedural history and the terms of the proposed settlement are set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.